Direct vs Indirect Representation: who owes what to EU customs?
Under EU Customs Code Article 18, non-EU companies can only file customs through a representative. Direct or indirect, the liability split is what matters.
On this page
A non-EU company cannot lodge a customs declaration in the EU by itself. Article 18 of the Union Customs Code is clear on this — the declarant must be established in the customs territory of the union. The way a non-EU importer gets a declaration filed is through a representative, and there are two kinds.
The difference between them is not a formality. It changes who is legally liable if customs later decides the declaration was wrong.
Direct representation in plain words
A direct representative files the customs declaration in the name of and on behalf of the importer. The importer is named on the declaration. The importer is the declarant. The direct representative is just the agent who lodged the paperwork.
Liability: entirely on the importer. If customs reassesses the classification, the duty owed, or catches a valuation error, the importer pays. The direct representative does not share liability unless they acted improperly (knowingly filed a false declaration, for example).
Useful for importers who are themselves EU-established and just want a customs broker to handle the filing mechanics. For a non-EU importer, direct representation is usually not available — many EU member states do not allow a non-EU company to be the declarant.
Indirect representation in plain words
An indirect representative files the customs declaration in their own name but on behalf of another person. The indirect representative is the declarant. They are, legally, the importer for customs purposes, even though commercially the goods belong to the non-EU party.
Liability: joint and several between the indirect representative and the principal. Customs can go after either party for the full amount of any reassessment, duty, VAT, or penalty.
This is the route non-EU companies use. The indirect representative (that is us, when we act in this role) carries real liability — which is why indirect representatives price their services higher than a simple customs broker would, and why you want an indirect representative who knows what they are classifying.
Why forwarders call themselves IOR but often are not
A lot of freight forwarders will cheerfully sign on as "Importer of Record" on a commercial invoice or as a line item in a quote. Check what they actually do.
The test is simple: do they file the customs declaration in their own EORI number? If yes, they are acting as an indirect representative (or as the actual importer) and they carry joint and several liability. If they are filing in your name — a name that does not appear in the EU business register — then legally nothing is happening. The declaration will either be rejected or quietly filed wrongly and become an audit problem two years later.
Ask the provider: "Whose EORI number goes on box 8 of the SAD?" If the answer is "yours" and you do not have one, there is a problem.
When customs rejects the declaration
Spanish AEAT, German Zoll, Dutch Douane — they all maintain databases of authorized representatives. If the EORI on the declaration does not match an authorized representative or a valid EU importer, the declaration gets flagged.
What happens next depends on the country and how busy customs is that week. Best case: the declaration is rejected and you have three days to resubmit properly. Worst case: the cargo is held and you pay warehousing fees until you sort it out.
Our role in this
DDP Spain is authorized as an indirect representative in Spain. We file the declaration in our own name, take joint and several liability, and use our EORI on the paperwork. The audit trail is clean, customs recognizes us on sight, and you have a real IOR rather than a name on an invoice.